Issue spotting at intake is not about proving the case. It is about quickly identifying the legal and practical “gotchas” that change whether you take the matter, how you staff it, what you request first, and what the case is worth. A tight, repeatable checklist helps you do that consistently,
Jury selection is the point where your trial plan stops being a memo and starts becoming a live performance. Before you pick a jury, you want to know (not hope) that your theme is tight, your witnesses are ready, your exhibits are admissible, and your logistics will not break at
Trials are won twice, once in the room and once on appeal. The lawyer in trial who consistently “wins the record” is not just persuasive, they are precise. They make it easy for the judge to rule correctly in the moment, and for a later reader (law clerk, appellate panel,
Litigation moves fast, and the fastest way to lose time (or credibility) is a messy case file: “Final_v3_REVISED(1).docx,” missing exhibits, and no record of who changed what. Litigation document control is the discipline that prevents those problems with three simple pillars: consistent naming, reliable versioning, and
A deposition transcript is only valuable if you can use it, quickly. The fastest litigators and paralegals are not reading 200 pages line by line, they are building depo summaries that surface admissions, lock in timelines, and preserve impeachment-ready quotes with clean page:line citations. Below is a practical, repeatable
Deposition testimony only becomes useful when it is easy to cite, easy to search by issue, and easy to drop into a motion or trial binder. The best deposition summaries do that work upfront, they turn a 250-page transcript into a set of reliable “handles” you can pull when drafting
Strategy fails most often at the handoff, when a strong case theory never becomes a day to day plan the team can execute. The fix is not more brainstorming, it is a repeatable way to translate theory into tasks, outputs, owners, and deadlines. This guide walks through a practical litigation
When a deposition goes sideways, it is rarely because counsel “didn’t know the case.” It is usually because the deposition documents were not controlled: the right exhibits were not marked, the right materials were not shared (or were shared incorrectly), and nobody left with a clean, usable summary. Below
Clean admissions win cases because they travel well. A crisp “Yes” in the transcript (and on video) can power summary judgment, drive mediation leverage, or undercut a witness at trial without a fight over what they “meant.” The goal of a strong deposition strategy is not more questions, it is
A good trial outline does two jobs at once: it tells a coherent story a jury can follow, and it maps every story beat to admissible proof. If either side is missing, openings drift into argument without evidence, or the proof arrives as a confusing pile of facts. Below is
When litigation work gets busy, the bottleneck is rarely legal knowledge. It is the time it takes to turn raw records, PDFs, and discovery into clean, usable drafts. A strong workflow makes that conversion repeatable, auditable, and fast, without sacrificing attorney judgment. Below are practical, litigation-ready workflows you can run
Discovery gets expensive and messy when every possible request looks “important.” A practical discovery strategy is less about asking for everything and more about sequencing the right requests so you prove liability, causation, and damages quickly, while staying proportional. Below is a simple framework you can reuse in almost any